EWG sent me this chart on the voting records of Congressmen on bills to weaken safety from toxic chemicals. We can be proud of Ciciline and Langevin - they both have perfect records. But if you know people in states that aren't so lucky, you might want to share this record with them. if you click on the orange "click here" phrase below, you can right click to copy and paste the actual link into the browser. Take action. Spread the word!
In the past three years, Congress has reversed or delayed chemical bans, gutted chemical safety rules, rejected sound science, weakened worker and consumer protections, and denied justice to asbestos victims. But many representatives are hoping to hide their toxic voting records.
Here at EWG Action Fund, we think you deserve to know the truth about these votes.
EWG Action Fund went through and examined the voting record of every member of the U.S. House of Representatives and created a toxic chemical policy scorecard so you can know where your member stands.
This is the first time there has been a scorecard focused solely on chemicals and your health.
Here is how to read the scorecard:
- The scorecard is organized alphabetically by state and then numerically by congressional district.
- Next to the representative’s name, we have listed 17 bills and indicated when the representative voted to strengthen (green checkmark) or weaken (red x-mark) policy related to chemicals in the environment.
- We calculated the percentage of their votes that were pro-environment and gave each member a score. The higher the score, the more they voted to protect our environment and health.
You can learn more about the different bills here.
- EWG Action Fund
P.S. The most important thing you can do this year is exercise your right to vote. Can we count on you to turn out? Click here and pledge to vote!